Its a tough question because when you hit a good hand, you want to win as many chips on that hand as possible.
However when you slowplay then you risk giving an opponent the chance to catch up and overtake you.
It really does depend on the cards on the board, and the type of player you are up against.
If the board is showing scary cards for your opponent - eg: 3 cards to a flush (and you have hit the flush) then it may be better to slowplay as your opponent(s) will be scared off quite quickly. If you have the nut flush it may be the right thing to give a free card hoping that your opponent is holding one card to the flush and catches up a bit on the next card.
If the board is showing scary cards for you - then take the pot down there and then and make sure of winning the hand - so if there is 2 cards to a flush or a straight possibility which would beat your hand then make your opponents pay to see another card - make them play against the odds if they are on a draw.
Of course against more aggressive players you can slowplay more often and let them get some money in the pot before raising it up and revealing your strength.
Be careful with the sizes of your bets - get the balance right - don't bet too little as it will reveal your strength and don't scare your opponent off with a big bet (unless you want to take the pot down there and then)
So its a good question, but one that hasn't got an outright answer - as always it depends on the situation. Slowplay if you can to get maximum chips out your opponent - but make there is money going into the pot and don't give your opponent free cards when there is a chance they can catch up.
My last point would to be carefull slowplaying against multiple players - If there is more than one opponent in the pot with you, I would be looking to narrow the field down with a bet. With more than one opponent in the pot there is more chance one of them can catch up.
__________________
The Professor
Poker Professor Support Team
Last edited by The Professor : 07-28-2006 at 12:11 AM.
|